Indian Journal of Health Social Work
(UGC Care List Journal)
USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE
Ambrish Kumar1& Narendra Kumar Singh2
1Supervising Medical Social Service Officer, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow
2Senior PSW Officer, Department of PSW, Central Institute of Psychiatry, Kanke, Ranchi
Correspondence: Narendra Kumar Singh, e-mail: narendrapsw@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Social work is a field that is dedicated to improving the well-being and quality of life of individuals,
families, and communities. It is focused on helping people overcome their social problems and
challenges. With the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in recent years, there has been a growing
interest in how technology can be used to address social challenges. In recent years, the field of
clinical social work has begun exploring the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance
service delivery and client outcomes. So, this paper is emphasis to know the comprehensive
understanding of how AI technologies can revolutionize clinical social work practices. Therefore,
AI tools offer promising advancements in the field of clinical social work. While they present a
range of benefits, such as enhancing communication and streamlining case management, it is
crucial to approach their integration with caution, especially considering ethical concerns and
the importance of maintaining human empathy in social care.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Social Work Practice, Data Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Data Analysis and Personalized Care: In social work, the accumulation of extensive data, including client demographics, economic status, and social support networks, is commonplace. AI’s capability to process this data swiftly and precisely is revolutionizing the field. Such advanced tools not only enhance the effectiveness of interventions but also bring to light patterns and trends that might otherwise go unnoticed. This enables social workers to make more informed decisions. AI’s proficiency in analyzing historical data on interventions and outcomes empowers social workers to predict the success of specific strategies with individual clients. Consequently, this leads to the development of more effective intervention plans and minimizes the likelihood of adverse outcomes. Furthermore, AI aids in prioritizing tasks and optimizing resource distribution.
Chatbots, powered by AI, offer a confidential, unbiased space for individuals to discuss their challenges and access suitable resources and services. They are particularly effective in mental health contexts, where individuals might hesitate to seek human assistance due to social stigma. Chatbots provide immediate suggestions for managing distress, such as relaxation techniques, sleep improvement tips, reducing caffeine and alcohol intake, challenging negative thoughts, curtailing high risk behaviors, and encouraging social support. These AI-driven chatbots, equipped with sophisticated natural language processing capabilities, can conduct meaningful conversations, suggest coping strategies, and direct users to relevant resources. They serve as a crucial bridge in mental health services, especially in regions where access to mental health professionals is limited.
Data Analysis and Personalized Care: In social work, the accumulation of extensive data, including client demographics, economic status, and social support networks, is commonplace. AI’s capability to process this data swiftly and precisely is revolutionizing the field. Such advanced tools not only enhance the effectiveness of interventions but also bring to light patterns and trends that might otherwise go unnoticed. This enables social workers to make more informed decisions. AI’s proficiency in analyzing historical data on interventions and outcomes empowers social workers to predict the success of specific strategies with individual clients. Consequently, this leads to the development of more effective intervention plans and minimizes the likelihood of adverse outcomes. Furthermore, AI aids in prioritizing tasks and optimizing resource distribution. Chatbots and Mental Health Support: Chatbots, powered by AI, offer a confidential, unbiased space for individuals to discuss their challenges and access suitable resources and services. They are particularly effective in mental health contexts, where individuals might hesitate to seek human assistance due to social stigma. Chatbots provide immediate suggestions for managing distress, such as relaxation techniques, sleep improvement tips, reducing caffeine and alcohol intake, challenging negative thoughts, curtailing high risk behaviors, and encouraging social support. These AI-driven chatbots, equipped with sophisticated natural language processing capabilities, can conduct meaningful conversations, suggest coping strategies, and direct users to relevant resources. They serve as a crucial bridge in mental health services, especially in regions where access to mental health professionals is limited.
Informed Consent and Client Autonomy: Social workers have a long-standing commitment to ensuring clients are fully informed about the benefits and risks of services, a practice crucial when integrating AI technologies like ChatGPT. According to ethical guidelines (Barsky, 2019; Reamer, 2018a, 2018b, 2023a), and the NASW Code of Ethics (2021), social workers must t horoughly inform clients about AI’s implications, including ChatGPT’s role in their care, allowing clients to make informed choices about using these technologies.
In conclusion, while AI, including tools like ChatGPT, offers immense potential in enhancing medical social work practice, its i ntegration demands careful ethical consideration. Balancing AI’s efficiencies with the profession’s human-centric approach is essential. Social workers must address challenges related to client surveillance, plagiarism, algorithmic bias, and the broader ethical use of AI to ensure that these technologies are utilized in a manner that is responsible, equitable, and in the best interests of clients. As AI continues to evolve, so too must the ethical frameworks that guide its use in social work, ensuring that the profession remains both innovative and ethically grounded.
REFERENCES
Asakura, K., Occhiuto, K., Todd, S., Leithead,
C., & Clapperton, R. (2020). A call to
action on artificial intelligence and
social work education: Lessons
learned from a simulation project
using
natural
l anguage
processing. Journal of Teaching in
Social Work, 40, 501-518.
Barsky, A. (2019). Ethics and values in social
work: An integrated approach for a
comprehensive curriculum (2nd
ed.). Oxford University Press.
Diez, E. (2023). Artificial intelligence and
social work: Contributions to an
ethical artificial intelligence at the
service of the people. In A. López
Peláez & G. Kirwan (Eds.), The
Routledge international handbook
of digital social work (pp. 368
381).
European
Commission.
(2019). Independent high-level
expert group on artificial
intelligence: A definition of AI—
Main
capabilities
and
disciplines. Author. https://digital
strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/
definition-artificial-intelligence
main-capabilities-and-scientific
disciplines
Frackiewicz, M. (2023, May 5). The ethics
of artificial intelligence in
autonomous social work and
c ounseling. TS2. https://
t s2.space/en/the-ethics-of
a r ti f i ci al- i nt el li g ence-in
autonomous-social-work-and
counseling/
Gillingham, P. (2019). Can predictive
algorithms assist decision making
in social work with children and
families? Child Abuse Review,
28, 114–126.
Goldkind, L. (2021). Social work and
artificial intelligence: Into the
matrix. Social Work, 66, 372-374.
Keddell, E. (2019). Algorithmic justice in
child protection: Statistical
fairness, social justice and the
implications for practice. Social
Sciences, 8, 281.
Liedgren, P., Elvhage, G., Ehrenberg, A., &
Kullberg, C. (2016). The use of
decision support systems in social
work: A scoping study literature
review. Journal of Evidence
Informed Social Work, 13, 1– 20.
Luxton, D. (Ed.). (2016). Artificial intelligence
i n behavioral and mental health
care. Academic Press.
Molala, T., & Mbaya, T. (2023). Social work
and artificial intelligence: Towards the
electronic social work field of
specialisation. International Journal of
Social Science Research and Review,
6, 613-621.
National Association of Social Workers.
(2017). Code of ethics of the
National Association of Social
Workers. Washington, DC:
National Association of Social Workers.
(2021). Code of ethics of the National
Association
of
Social
Workers. Washington, DC: Pascoe, K.
(2023). Considerations for integrating
technology into social work practice:
A content analysis of nine professional
social work associations’ codes of
ethics. International Social Work,
66, 298-312.
Plante, T. (2023, February 6). The ethics of
AI applications for mental health
care. Markkula Center for Applied
Ethics. https://www.scu.edu/ethics
spotlight/generative-ai-ethics/the
ethics-of-ai-applications-for-mental
health-care/
Pocock, K. (2023, June 9). Is ChatGPT
plagiarism free? PC Guide. https://
www.pcguide.com/apps/is-chat-gpt
plagiarism-free/
Reamer, F. (2018a). Ethical standards in
social
work: A review of
the NASW Code of Ethics. NASW Press
Reamer, F. (2018b). Social work values and
ethics (5th ed.). Columbia University
Press.
Reamer, F. (2023b). Ethical practice in a post
Roe world: A guide for social
workers. Social Work, 68, 150-158.
Rice, E., Yoshioka-Maxwell, A., Petering, R.,
Onasch-Vera, L., Craddock, J., Tambe,
M., Yadav, A., Wilder, B., Woo, D.,
Winetrobe, H., & Wilson, N. (2018).
Piloting the use of artificial intelligence
t o enhance HIV prevention
interventions for youth experiencing
homelessness. Journal of the Society
for Social Work and Research, 9, 551
573.
Rubeis, G. (2022). iHealth: The ethics of
artificial intelligence and big data in
mental
healthcare. Internet
Interventions, 28.
Schneider, D., & Seelmeyer, U. (2019).
Challenges in using big data to develop
decision support systems for social
work in Germany. Journal of
Technology in Human Services,
37, 113–128.
Tambe, M., & Rice, E. (Eds.). (2018). Artificial
i ntelligence
and
social
work. Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, K., & Cartwright, C. (2018). Artificial
intelligence and social work: A critical
review. International Social Work,
61(6), 801-813.
Hewson, J. (2019). Artificial intelligence and
social work: Opportunities and
challenges. Australian Social Work,
72(2), 183-195.
Koehler, J. A., Brown, M., Wheatley, M., &
Koehler, J. (2018). Social work
practice in the age of artificial
intelligence. Journal of Technology in
Human Services, 36(3), 148-159.
National Association of Social Workers.
(2017). Code of Ethics of the National
Association of Social Workers.
Retrieved
from https://
www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/
Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English
Whittaker, A., & Zimmerman, E. (2018). AI for
social good: Opportunities and
challenges. AI Magazine, 39(4), 5-10
Conflict of interest: None
Role of funding source: None